|
6
|
Identifying
Evaluative Criteria
- What criteria, related
to identified outcomes/standards and indicators, will be
used to evaluate student products and performances?
- Do these criteria
reflect the most valued elements of student performance?
|
 |
Criteria for
evaluating performance tasks are established using the indicators for
the assessed activity(ies).
How are
criteria established?
Using these
indicators, proficiency levels can be established to determine the
extent to which students have mastered the skills or understandings.
For each set of skills or understandings, scoring tools can be
developed to measure the degree of proficiency for each area.
Differences in these degrees are described below.
|
Degrees
of Understanding
|
Degrees
of Proficiency
|
- thorough/complete
- substantial
- partial/incomplete
- misunderstanding/serious
misconceptions
|
- expert
- advanced
- intermediate
- novice
|
|
Degrees
of Frequency
|
Degrees
of Effectiveness
|
- usually/consistently
- frequently
- sometimes
- rarely
- never
|
- highly effective
- effective
- moderately effective
- minimally effective
- ineffective
|
These degrees can
be used in scoring tools to assess the achievement of students on a
given task.
CLICK
HERE for more information on rubrics, rules, and keys.
Excerpted
from Designing Performance Assessment Tasks,
Maryland Assessment Consortium, 1995.
Design
Process Steps | 1 | 2
| 3 | 4
| 5 | 6
| 7 | 8
Back
to Developing Performance Tasks Home