A Process for Designing
Performance Assessment Tasks

Step 6: Identifying Evaluative Criteria

 

6

Identifying Evaluative Criteria

  • What criteria, related to identified outcomes/standards and indicators, will be used to evaluate student products and performances?
  • Do these criteria reflect the most valued elements of student performance?

Criteria for evaluating performance tasks are established using the indicators for the assessed activity(ies).

How are criteria established?

Using these indicators, proficiency levels can be established to determine the extent to which students have mastered the skills or understandings. For each set of skills or understandings, scoring tools can be developed to measure the degree of proficiency for each area. Differences in these degrees are described below.

Degrees of Understanding

Degrees of Proficiency

  • thorough/complete
  • substantial
  • partial/incomplete
  • misunderstanding/serious misconceptions
  • expert
  • advanced
  • intermediate
  • novice

Degrees of Frequency

Degrees of Effectiveness

  • usually/consistently
  • frequently
  • sometimes
  • rarely
  • never
  • highly effective
  • effective
  • moderately effective
  • minimally effective
  • ineffective

These degrees can be used in scoring tools to assess the achievement of students on a given task.

CLICK HERE for more information on rubrics, rules, and keys.

Excerpted from Designing Performance Assessment Tasks,
Maryland Assessment Consortium, 1995.

Design Process Steps | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8

Back to Developing Performance Tasks Home

This site was developed by the Department of Staff Development, in collaboration with the Division of Instruction. Questions, comments, and other inquiries may be addressed to Allene Chriest (achriest@pgcps.org) or Jeff Maher  (jmaher@pgcps.org).